Mechanical Characterization and Numerical Modeling of 316 Stainless Steel Specimens Fabricated Using SLM

Read full text
Authors: Ana-Gabriela Badea, Ştefan Tabacu, Alina-Ionela Aparaschivei, Denis Aurelian Negrea, Sorin Georgian Moga, CATALIN MARIAN DUCU
Cited by: 0
References: 54

Abstract

This study examines the influence of build orientation on the mechanical behavior of 316 stainless steel components fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM). Additively manufactured tensile specimens produced in different build orientations were experimentally analyzed and compared with reference specimens obtained from conventionally hot-rolled material and laser-cut to identical geometries. Uniaxial tensile testing combined with digital image correlation (DIC) was employed to evaluate the mechanical response and full-field strain evolution. Microstructural features were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), while phase composition was assessed by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results reveal a pronounced orientation-dependent mechanical anisotropy in the SLM specimens, reflected in variations in yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and ductility. Specimens loaded perpendicular to the build directions exhibited higher strength but reduced ductility compared to those loaded parallel to the build direction, whereas the rolled material showed a more isotropic mechanical response. Although the XYZ and XZY samples feature similar deposition patterns, the XRD analysis revealed a the existence of a 220 texture. Thus, the mechanical performances of XZY specimens are about 10% lower compared to XYZ printed samples. The stress maximum–strain curves were extrapolated from the true data using the Swift model. The section dedicated to numerical modeling includes a failure model based on the traixility. The numerical models were validated for the range η∈0.33…0.45 specific to uniaxial tension. Fractographic observations further confirmed the correlation between build orientation, microstructural features, and fracture behavior. The present study provides a multiscale experimental framework linking processing conditions, microstructure, and mechanical response in additively manufactured stainless steel.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies Cellular and Composite Structures

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
29–29
Publication date
10 January 2026
Language
EN