ABO Blood Groups, Lipids, and Coronary CT Imaging in A Japanese Single-Center Cohort

Read full text
Authors: Hiroyuki Tokue, Azusa Tokue, Yoshito Tsushima
Cited by: 0
References: 27

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Non-O ABO blood groups have been linked to higher coronary risk, plausibly via hemostatic and lipid pathways. However, evidence in Japanese populations and imaging-defined disease is limited. We examined whether ABO status relates to serum lipids and coronary CT imaging findings in Japanese adults. Materials and Methods: We reviewed adults who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) at our institution. After prespecified exclusions, 865 patients comprised the imaging cohort. For lipid analyses, we excluded patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy at the time of blood sampling, leaving 636 patients (lipid subset). ABO blood group was obtained from the medical record as recorded at registration (patient-reported) and was not re-confirmed by laboratory testing for this study. Outcomes were any coronary artery calcium (Agatston score > 0) and ≥50% luminal stenosis on CCTA. Results: In the lipid subset (n = 636), coronary calcium was present in 44–54% of patients across the four ABO groups and did not differ across groups (p = 0.33). Among assessable scans in the imaging cohort, ≥50% stenosis did not differ across the four ABO groups. In multivariable models (n = 636), older age, male sex, hypertension, and diabetes were independently associated with both outcomes (CAC presence and ≥50% stenosis) (all p < 0.05). For ≥50% stenosis, higher High-Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) was additionally associated with lower odds (p < 0.05). ABO status (O vs. non-O) was not independently associated with either outcome. Conclusions: In Japanese adults undergoing CCTA, type O blood was tied to lower HDL-C and higher diastolic pressure—features that track with cardiometabolic risk—yet ABO type did not independently relate to coronary calcium or CT-defined stenosis once standard risk factors were considered. These data suggest that, in this setting, ABO adds little beyond conventional risk profiling.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics Blood groups and transfusion Diabetes Cardiovascular Risks and Lipoproteins

Publication details

Journal / source
Medical Sciences
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
121–121
Publication date
4 March 2026
Language
EN