Evaluation of the Protective Efficacy of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccines Against O/CATHAY Topotype Virus in Pigs

Read full text
Authors: Ye-Ji Kim, Dong-Wan Kim, Mi-Kyeong Ko, Donghyeon Kim, S. J. Lee, Yerin Kim, Yeonrea Chae, Tae-jun Kim, H. J. Kim, Min Ja Lee, Sung-Han Park, Jaejo Kim
+3 more Jong-Hyeon Park, Ji-Hyeon Hwang, Yoon-Hee Lee
Cited by: 1
References: 30

Abstract

The world is divided into seven regional pools based on the serotype distribution and geographical spread of the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus. The Republic of Korea (ROK) belongs to Pool 1, where serotypes O, A, and Asia1 are endemic. Recently, the risk of incursions by the O/CATHAY topotype has increased in Pool 1, raising concerns about its potential introduction into the ROK. To assess the protective effectiveness of three commercial FMD vaccine strains—O1/Manisa + O/3039, O/Primorsky, and O1/Campos—currently used in the ROK against this topotype, an animal challenge experiment was conducted. Three treatment groups (n = 4 in each) of pigs received a single 2 mL injection of one of the vaccines at 8–10 weeks of age, and the other group (n = 2) served as the control. All pigs were challenged with the O/HKN/5/2019 virus (O/CATHAY topotype) at 21 days post-vaccination. All vaccines conferred protective effects, with O1/Campos demonstrating the highest efficacy by inducing fewest clinical signs and significantly reducing virus shedding in the treated groups compared with those in the control group. These findings suggest O1/Campos may serve as an emergency measure; nevertheless, the development of a vaccine specifically targeting the O/CATHAY topotype is warranted.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology Viral Infections and Immunology Research Global trade sustainability and social impact

Publication details

Journal / source
Microorganisms
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
186–186
Publication date
14 January 2026
Language
EN