The Conservation of Architectural Heritage Structures Built with Tuff and Coral Rock: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Geopolymer Formulation, Application, Compatibility and Durability

Read full text
Authors: Kent Benedict Salisid, Raul Lucero, Reymarvelos M. Oros, Mylah Villacorte-Tabelin, Theerayut Phengsaart, Shengguo Xue, Jiaqing Zeng, Ivy Corazon A. Mangaya-ay, Takahiko Arima, Ilhwan Park, Mayumi Ito, Sanghee Jeon
+1 more Carlito Baltazar Tabelin
Cited by: 1
References: 102

Abstract

The conservation of tuff- and coral rock-built architectural heritage structures (AHS) is challenging because access to original tuff and coral rock has become difficult and severely limited due to urbanization, land reclamation, the depletion of stone quarries, anti-mining and anti-quarrying legislation. An emerging approach to address this issue is to create compatible “replacement” rocks via geopolymerization, a process that is more sustainable and greener than the use of conventional cement and concrete. To explore the potential of geopolymers for AHS conservation strategies, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were implemented; 103 eligible articles were identified and classified into geopolymers for AHS (34 articles), tuff-built AHS (60 articles), and coral rock-built AHS (9 articles). Tuff substrates in AHSs appear in a variety of colors (yellowish-brown, grayish-cream, reddish-brown, pale greenish-gray and pink hues), densities (1.0–2.5 g/m3), and compressive strengths (3–100 MPa). Meanwhile, coral rock substrates in AHSs appear in whitish-cream color and are coarse-pored (1–5 MPa), fine-grained (8–15 MPa), and calcarenite (50–60 MPa). In terms of geopolymer formulation, metakaolin was reported as the most popular main precursor or admixture, while NaOH and Na2SiO3 were used simultaneously as alkaline activators. Aggregates used in geopolymer formulations depended on local availability, including quartz sand, river sand, crushed stones, carbonate stones, volcanic rock, volcanic sand, tuff, brick, ceramic tiles, and waste materials. Aesthetics, chemical composition, physical attributes, and mechanical properties have been identified as key criteria to ensure geopolymer compatibility for AHS conservation application. To date, geopolymers have been applied for AHS conservation as repair mortars, consolidants (i.e., grout and adhesives), and masonry strengthening (i.e., fiber-reinforced mortar). Finally, geopolymers formulated for AHS conservation have similar durability as the original substrate based on accelerated aging tests (i.e., salt mist, wet-dry, and freeze–thaw) and long-term outdoor exposure experiments.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Concrete and Cement Materials Research Building materials and conservation Microbial Applications in Construction Materials

Publication details

Journal / source
Minerals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
426–426
Publication date
20 April 2026
Language
EN