Anthropometric Characteristics Associated with 2000 m Rowing Ergometer Performance in Adolescent Athletes

Background: Anthropometric characteristics are known determinants of rowing performance, particularly during adolescence, when rapid physical growth affects strength, leverage, and movement efficiency. Understanding how body size and proportionality relate to rowing output is essential for contextualizing performance differences during youth rowing development. Objective: This study examined the associations between anthropometric variables and 2000 m ergometer performance in a multinational cohort of adolescent rowers, with separate analyses for males and females. Methods: A total of 126 youth rowers (65 males, 61 females) aged 14–16 years from eight countries participated. Standardized anthropometric measurements including body height, body mass, body fat (F%), relative muscle mass (M%), limb lengths, and body surface area (BSA) were assessed. Performance was assessed via maximal 2000 m ergometer testing, recording mean power output (W). Results: Significant anthropometric differences were observed between sexes. Performance outcomes mirrored these patterns: males produced substantially greater ergometer power (327.10 ± 48.65 W) compared to females (219.63 ± 30.96 W, p = 0.015). Across nations, anthropometric and performance means differed numerically but showed no statistically significant between-country differences (p > 0.05), despite small-to-moderate effect sizes. Correlation analyses revealed strong positive associations between ergometer power and body height (males: r = 0.70; females: r = 0.71), body mass (males: r = 0.75; females: r = 0.70), relative muscle mass (males: r = 0.62; females: r = 0.64) and body surface area (males: r = 0.78; females: r = 0.73). Relative fat mass showed a moderate-to-strong negative association with performance (males: r = −0.67; females: r = −0.64; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Anthropometric variables—particularly height, body mass, muscle mass, and body surface area—are strongly associated with rowing ergometer performance in adolescent athletes. These findings underscore the relevance of morphological profiling in youth rowing and provide descriptive insight into anthropometric–performance relationships during early junior rowing.