Islam as a ‘White Whale’: Narrative Obsession, Alterity, and Civilizational Anxiety in V. S. Naipaul’s Among the Believers

This paper critiques the discursive knowledge productions in V. S. Naipaul’s Among the Believers by challenging the authority of its purported firsthand observations of practising Muslims across four Muslim-majority societies. It argues the book’s discursive knowledge production is not grounded in empirical ethnography but is instead manufactured through specific narrative and rhetorical strategies. Drawing on theoretical frameworks from Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari (deterritorialization), Homi Bhabha (mimicry and ambivalence), and Paul de Man (prosopopoeia), the study demonstrates how Naipaul constructs a civilizational hierarchy by positioning himself against anthropological knowledge, trivializing or appropriating peripheral writers, selectively manipulating canonical and non-canonical texts, and orchestrating encounters with interlocutors. The analysis examines how these techniques create a narrative backdrop for critiquing Islamic institutions and practices, including Sharīʿah, religious pedagogy, and educational systems such as the pesantren. Through Orientalist framing, selective historicism, and rhetorical ventriloquism, Naipaul consistently represents the Islamic world as a site of civilizational deficiency in contrast to his ideal of a Western ‘universal civilization’. The paper further engages the writings of key intellectuals—Geertz, Illich, Foucault, Iqbal, and Maududi—to counter Naipaul’s civilizational diagnosis and to foreground alternative internal critiques of modernity, politics, and education. It concludes that Naipaul’s treatment of Islam participates in a longer discursive tradition shaped by Enlightenment-derived narratives of cultural hierarchy rather than neutral ethnographic inquiry.