Application of the Thermo-RAdiometric Normalization of Crop Observations (TRANCO) Back in Time: An Assessment of the Potential for Crop Time-Series Generalization to Past Years Using Wheat as a Proxy

Read full text
Authors: Juanma Cintas, Emilio Guirado, Jaime Martínez‐Valderrama, Italo Giuliano Moletto-Lobos, Carmen López-Zayas, Tamara Escamilla, Inbal Becker‐Reshef, Javier Cabello, Maria Jacoba Salinas-Bonillo, Belen Franch
Cited by: 0
References: 83

Abstract

Crop type maps are essential for food security. However, there is a gap in information for worldwide maps that, at the same time, cover a wide period of time. The inability of classification algorithms to generalize information across years is one of the main reasons for this lack of information. This study aims to advance this direction by normalizing annual time series of wheat crops using the accumulation of Growing Degree Days (GDDs). Based on the Crop Data Layer (CDL) crop-type maps and Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery, we built yearly time series for the period 2008–2020. Then, we tested the performance of two normalization approaches: TRANCO, which uses Growing Degree Days (GDDs) and Crop Calendars to normalize time-series data; and Time Windows, which uses Crop Calendars to define wheat’s biofix dates and normalize time-series data. Furthermore, we compared them with a Baseline, meaning a time series without further processing. Such performance was tested in two main ways: By computing the Jeffries–Matusita (JM) distances between time series and their average behavior, and by training random forest classifiers. For the latter, we defined a training period (2017–2020) during which we trained the models, and a validation period (2008–2016), during which we validated them on years the models were not trained on. We found that TRANCO was the best normalization approach for bringing the time-series closer to a common behavior (JM = 0.3), compared to Time windows (JM = 0.4) or the Baseline. Also, it achieved the best classification results (F1 = 0.779), compared to Time windows (F1 = 0.71) or the Baseline (F1 = 0.73), and, in addition, TRANCO’s classifier was the most stable throughout the validation period, empowering past crop type classifications with classifiers trained in recent years.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Remote Sensing in Agriculture Remote-Sensing Image Classification Smart Agriculture and AI

Publication details

Journal / source
Remote Sensing
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
571–571
Publication date
12 February 2026
Language
EN