Wasta and the Erosion of Social Bonds: Evidence from Two Universities in Southern Jordan

This study aims to explore perceptions among students at Jordanian universities regarding “wasta,” defined as the use of social relations or kinship ties to pressure faculty members into granting them undeserved academic privileges, and to examine the impact of these perceptions on their academic behaviors and attitudes toward their institution. The study uses Travis Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory, which posits that the strength of social bonds is determined by four key elements: attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. The researchers designed a survey using a proportionally stratified random sample of 748 students from two universities in the south of Jordan. The data were collected using a questionnaire whose validity and reliability were deemed suitable for analysis. The findings reveal a varying degree of erosion in social bonds as follows: while students expressed a rejection of wasta on ethical grounds, the involvement of others in such behavior to gain unearned academic advantages undermined their sense of belonging to the university. Participants also indicated that their peers’ reliance on wasta devalued their individual efforts and weakened trust in the fairness of the educational institution. Furthermore, students’ motivation to participate in campus activities was lower when they perceived that opportunities were granted based on connections rather than merit, while statistical significance was observed only for the involvement dimension in favor of the public university. Last, some students saw wasta as a practical resource in the absence of institutional justice, even if they recognized the harm it causes to academic integrity and the value of university credentials. The findings highlight the importance of addressing wasta within academic institutions by strengthening transparent decision making and academic integrity safeguards to enhance fairness and strengthen trust.