Ensemble Machine Learning for Operational Water Quality Monitoring Using Weighted Model Fusion for pH Forecasting

Read full text
Authors: Wenwen Chen, Yinzi Shao, Zhicheng Xu, Zhou Bing, Shuhe Cui, Zhenxiang Dai, Shuai Yin, Yuewen Gao, Lili Liu
Cited by: 6
References: 37

Abstract

Water quality monitoring faces increasing challenges due to accelerating industrialization and urbanization, demanding accurate, real-time, and reliable prediction technologies. This study presents a novel ensemble learning framework integrating Gaussian Process Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Random Forest algorithms for high-precision water quality pH prediction. The research utilized a comprehensive spatiotemporal dataset, comprising 11 water quality parameters from 37 monitoring stations across Georgia, USA, spanning 705 days from January 2016 to January 2018. The ensemble model employed a dynamic weight allocation strategy based on cross-validation error performance, assigning optimal weights of 34.27% to Random Forest, 33.26% to Support Vector Regression, and 32.47% to Gaussian Process Regression. The integrated approach achieved superior predictive performance, with a mean absolute error of 0.0062 and coefficient of determination of 0.8533, outperforming individual base learners across multiple evaluation metrics. Statistical significance testing using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with a Bonferroni correction confirmed that the ensemble significantly outperforms all individual models (p < 0.001). Comparison with state-of-the-art models (LightGBM, XGBoost, TabNet) demonstrated competitive or superior ensemble performance. Comprehensive ablation experiments revealed that Random Forest removal causes the largest performance degradation (+4.43% MAE increase). Feature importance analysis revealed the dissolved oxygen maximum and conductance mean as the most influential predictors, contributing 22.1% and 17.5%, respectively. Cross-validation results demonstrated robust model stability with a mean absolute error of 0.0053 ± 0.0002, while bootstrap confidence intervals confirmed narrow uncertainty bounds of 0.0060 to 0.0066. Spatiotemporal analysis identified station-specific performance variations ranging from 0.0036 to 0.0150 MAE. High-error stations (12, 29, 33) were analyzed to distinguish characteristics, including higher pH variability and potential upstream pollution influences. An integrated software platform was developed featuring intuitive interface, real-time prediction, and comprehensive visualization tools for environmental monitoring applications.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Hydrological Forecasting Using AI Water Quality and Pollution Assessment Water Quality Monitoring Technologies

Publication details

Journal / source
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
1200–1200
Publication date
24 January 2026
Language
EN