Population–Function Interactions and Spatial Restructuring in a Mountain City: Evidence from Chongqing, China

Read full text
Authors: Hao Yang, Dawei Yang, Qingming Jian, Changming Yu
Cited by: 1
References: 106

Abstract

Understanding how urban spatial structure evolves under environmental constraints is essential for sustainable urban development and planning practice. However, existing studies often analyze population distribution and urban functions separately, providing limited explanation of the mechanisms underlying urban spatial restructuring. This limitation is particularly evident in mountain cities, where topographic constraints, fragmented developable land, and corridor-based accessibility shape distinctive spatial patterns. Using Chongqing as a case study, this study examines the evolution of its central urban area between 2020 and 2024 from an integrated population–function perspective. Multi-temporal Baidu residential and employment population data and POI data are used to characterize population activities and urban functions. A functional reinterpretation framework is developed by aggregating conventional POI categories into three dimensions: prosperity, dynamism, and synergy. Kernel density estimation, density difference analysis, Getis–Ord Gi* hotspot analysis, and population–function relationship analysis are applied to examine spatial evolution and interaction patterns under topographic constraints. The results show that Chongqing experienced substantial spatial restructuring characterized by increasing polycentricity and internal reorganization rather than simple outward expansion. Residential and employment populations expanded along river valleys and development corridors, while employment activities remained more concentrated in established centers. Functional evolution shows clear differentiation: prosperity remains concentrated in traditional centers, dynamism expands toward emerging development platforms, and synergy diffuses through residential and transportation networks. Residential populations are more strongly associated with synergy functions, whereas employment populations are more closely linked to dynamism functions.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Land Use and Ecosystem Services Urbanization and City Planning Urban Transport and Accessibility

Publication details

Journal / source
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
18
Issue
14
Pages
7410–7410
Publication date
20 July 2026
Language
EN