Industry 4.0/5.0 Maturity Models: Empirical Validation, Sectoral Scope, and Applicability to Emerging Economies

This article presents an academic literature analysis of 75 Industry 4.0 (I4.0) and Industry 5.0 (I5.0) maturity models published between 2020 and 2024, examining their empirical validation, sectoral scope, geographical origin, and stated applicability to developing-country contexts. The study combines descriptive profiling, contingency-table analyses with exact tests and effect sizes, and a large-scale synthesis of 562 research gaps reported by model authors. Knowledge production is highly concentrated in single-country studies (77.3%) and in developed economies, while most models do not explicitly or implicitly document applicability to developing-country settings (approximately 83%). Empirical validation practices are uneven, with multiple-case studies (33.3%) and surveys (24.0%) dominating, and sectoral coverage is strongly skewed toward manufacturing, limiting transferability to other sectors relevant for emerging economies. A statistically detectable association is observed between the development level of the model’s country of origin and the presence of applicability statements (χ2 = 17.13, p