Comparative outcomes of early and late rectourethral fistula: insights from a multicentric retrospective study on multidisciplinary management strategies

Read full text
Authors: Pauline Jeannot, Edouard Roussel, Alexandre Dutoit, Maxime K. Collard, Niki Christou, Jérémie H. Lefèvre, Amine Souadka, Arnaud Alvès, Antonio Castaldi, Martin B. Bertrand, Nicolas Michot, B. Faivre d’Arcier
+4 more Jean‐Jacques Tuech, Franck Bruyère, Urs Giger-Pabst, Mehdi Ouaïssi
Cited by: 0
References: 20

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the natural history of early and late rectourethral fistulas (RUFs) and to determine the long-term outcomes of a multidisciplinary management approach. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients with RUF who were treated by a combined colorectal and urological team. Early RUF (ERUF) was defined as occurring within 31 days after surgery, while late RUF (LRUF) was defined as occurring thereafter. Surgical procedures and the surgeons involved were recorded, in addition to clinical assessments, radiological findings, and oncological assessments. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients diagnosed with RUF were treated between January 1, 2010, and June 2023. Patients were divided into ERUF (n=37) and LRUF (n=35) groups. After conservative management, comparisons of success rates for graciloplasty, York-Mason, and delayed coloanal anastomosis as second and third treatments showed higher rates for graciloplasty in ERUF than in LRUF (83% vs. 40%, P=0.034; 71% vs. 33%, P=0.500; and 60% vs. 40%, P>0.999, respectively). The ERUF group demonstrated significantly higher cure rates after the second treatment (83.8% vs. 40.0%, P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes Ureteral procedures and complications

Publication details

Journal / source
Annals of Coloproctology
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
103–114
Publication date
27 February 2026
Language
EN