ON THE ISSUE OF JURISDICTION OVER CORPORATE DISPUTES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

This article examines the jurisdiction of corporate disputes in civil law proceedings. The author explores general issues of jurisdiction delineation, its concept, types, and subject-matter criteria. The article analyzes the subject-matter and subject-matter criteria for differentiating jurisdiction between jurisdictional bodies. The author's position suggests that the legal category of "jurisdiction" cannot be abandoned either in civil law procedural doctrine or in current procedural legislation. The article also examines the current legal regulation of the subject-matter competence of arbitration courts, courts of general jurisdiction, and arbitration tribunals for the consideration and resolution of corporate disputes, using examples from judicial practice. The study concludes that current law enforcement practice adheres to the position that the distribution of corporate disputes between arbitration courts and courts of general jurisdiction is carried out in accordance with the subject-matter and subject-matter criteria for delineating jurisdiction. The delimitation of corporate disputes between state courts and arbitration courts is carried out in accordance with the arbitrability criterion, taking into account the subject-matter and subject-matter criteria for delimiting jurisdiction.