Eco-Efficient Vessel Dynamics: An Interval Approach to Heave Response and Energy-Saving in Rough Seas

Read full text
Authors: Suleiman Mohammad, Markala Karthik, Nijalingappa Yogeesh, Hanan Jadallah, Asokan Vasudevan, Azizbek Matmuratov, Mashkhura Sultonova
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Maritime transport faces increasing pressure to reduce fuel consumption and emissions, yet vessel performance under variable sea states remains difficult to bound reliably. Traditional stochastic and data-driven models provide probabilistic forecasts but lack strict guarantees in extreme or out-of-sample conditions. This study develops a deterministic arithmetic-interval framework that replaces uncertain hydrodynamic parameters and wave forcing with bounded intervals. The vessel’s single-degree-of-freedom heave equation is reformulated as an interval differential equation, and existence and uniqueness of the resulting solution tube are established. Validated numerical techniques-interval Taylor expansions, Picard iteration, and adaptive subdivision-are used to compute tight heave envelopes. An interval energy metric integrates worst-case power demand over a voyage, and a branch-and-bound global optimizer selects control parameters (e.g., speed schedules) that minimize the upper-bound energy while satisfying seakeeping constraints. Two hypothetical Karnataka-coast scenarios (“calm” and “rough” seas) demonstrate the rigor and efficiency of the approach. Computed energy-consumption intervals exactly enclose corresponding Monte-Carlo extremes, confirming tightness without large sample sizes. Rough-sea conditions increase worst-case energy demand by approximately 75% despite negligible heave amplitudes at the micron scale. Sensitivity analysis shows that wave-amplitude uncertainty dominates energy variability, while vessel stiffness and damping have minimal influence. The proposed interval framework eliminates under-coverage of worst-case energy (0% missed extremes) and remains within 3–6% of the tightest Monte-Carlo 99% confidence bands, achieving comparable bound tightness with two orders of magnitude fewer model evaluations than CNN–BiLSTM–Attention and kernel-density-based predictors. Benchmarking against linear heave RAO predictions confirms hydrodynamic consistency. The approach provides decision-makers with mathematically guaranteed bounds, supporting targeted measurement, control, and sustainable maritime operations.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability Maritime Navigation and Safety

Publication details

Journal / source
Sustainable Marine Structures
Pages
41–63
Publication date
16 January 2026