Legal mechanisms of pace influence on the legislative process of Ukraine

The paper examines the complex of legal and quasi-legal instruments through which the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) and its associated institutions (the Venice Commission, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the Committee of Ministers) influence the content and procedure of the legislative process in Ukraine. The purpose of the paper is the systematization of these mechanisms, a critical analysis of their legal nature (especially within the context of the soft law doctrine), and an assessment of their actual effectiveness in conditions of national implementation. The paper employs a system-structural method for classifying mechanisms; a comparative legal method for analyzing the status of Council of Europe acts and their integration into the national legal system; and a case-study method for assessing the real consequences of reforms initiated under international monitoring (in particular, judicial and prosecutorial reforms). Scientific novelty lies in the doctrinal substantiation of the quasi-obligatory nature of the Venice Commission's conclusions, transforming political monitoring by PACE into a legal imperative to avoid the unconstitutionality of laws. It is established that PACE influence functions through a two-channel system: preventive expert influence (Venice Commission) and imperative binding influence (implementation of ECtHR judgments). Although PACE resolutions are soft law, the conclusions of the Venice Commission acquire the status of an authoritative source for constitutional jurisdiction. The actual effectiveness of these mechanisms is significantly undermined by internal factors, including institutional instability (cyclical changes in the High Council of Justice (HCJ)/High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ)) and administrative misconduct (failures in prosecutor certification). Practical significance and conclusions. The results of the work are of practical significance for improving the quality of legislative drafting in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and harmonizing national legislation with European standards. It is determined that achieving the goals of European monitoring requires Ukraine to focus on ensuring the consistency of changes and the effective enforcement of existing laws, as well as guaranteeing the conscientious implementation of decisions.