Digitalization of judicial proceedings: The experience of regional integration organizations

The article examines the digital transformation of judicial processes within the following integration organizations: the European Union (EU), the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR), and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The relevance of the study stems from the fact that effective digitalization of justice has become a key prerequisite for the functioning of integration-based judicial mechanisms. Thus, cross-border disputes require unified electronic procedures, while disparities in the digital maturity of member states hinder access to justice and slow the development of a common legal space. The aim was to identify the institutional solutions, technological tools, and constraints characteristic of the digitalization of judicial processes in integration organizations. The methodological framework included a comparative legal approach, institutional analysis, as well as the examination of legal acts, strategic documents, and academic publications on digital justice issued between 2010 and 2024. The study revealed varying levels of digital maturity across the integration organizations in question. In the EU, the following elements have been implemented: the e-Curia unified electronic system, the e-Justice portal, and digital interaction with national courts. The main limitations include inconsistent technological standards among member states and the complexity of modernizing judicial infrastructure. In the EAEU, the following components have been implemented: electronic submission of applications to the EAEU Court, digital publication of its decisions, and pilot use of videoconferencing. The key obstacles are the absence of a unified digital platform for the Union and low interoperability among national IT systems. In MERCOSUR, digitalization is fragmented (electronic document management and remote hearings of arbitration bodies), yet there are no unified digital regulations or integration with national justice systems. In ASEAN, digitalization progresses exclusively within national initiatives, since the organization does not possess its own judicial body. Here, the main constraint is the impossibility of procedural harmonization due to the intergovernmental nature of ASEAN. The study concludes that digitalization can enhance transparency, accelerate judicial procedures, and improve cross-border access to justice. However, critical barriers persist, including inconsistent legal frameworks, the lack of common technological standards, and infrastructural asymmetry among member states.