J-PAS: Semisupervised Sim-to-Obs Transfer for Robust Star–Galaxy–Quasar Classification

Read full text
Authors: Daniel López-Cano, L. Raul Abramo, Lilianne Mariko Izuti Nakazono, Ignasi Pérez-Ràfols, G. Martínez-Solaeche, J. Chaves-Montero, Matthew M. Pieri, J. S. Alcaniz, Narciso Benítez, Silvia Bonoli, Saulo Carneiro, A. J. Cenarro
+19 more D. Cristòbal-Hornillos, S. Daflon, Renato A. Dupke, A. Ederoclite, Rosa María González Delgado, Antonio Hernán-Caballero, Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo, Jifeng Liu, C. López-Sanjuán, A. Marín-Franch, C. Mendes de Oliveira, Mariano Moles, F. Roig, Laerte Sodré Jr., Keith Taylor, Jesús Varela, Héctor Vázquez Ramió, Jose Vilchez, Javier Zaragoza-Cardiel
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract Modern astrophysics and cosmology increasingly rely on simulations and cross-survey analyses, yet differences in instrumentation, calibration, and modeling introduce distribution mismatches between simulated and observed datasets (domain shift). This occurs when the joint distribution of inputs and labels differs between the training (source) and target domains, so source-trained models underperform on the target. Domain adaptation (DA), the branch of transfer learning for this case—fixed task, shifted input–label distribution—provides principled ways to mitigate it. We study a concrete simulation-to-observation (sim-to-obs) case: semisupervised domain adaptation (SSDA) to adapt a four-class spectral classifier (high-redshift quasars, low-redshift quasars, galaxies, and stars) from DESI-based J-PAS mock catalogs to real J-PAS photometry. Because labels are plentiful in simulations but scarce in the target survey, our pipeline pretrains on labeled DESI→J-PAS mocks and adapts using a small, labeled J-PAS subset (of which only 242 are high-redshift quasars). We benchmark SSDA against a J-PAS–only-supervised model (same labeled subset) and a mock-only model-evaluated zero-shot on J-PAS, plus the same model on its in-domain mock test set (four evaluations total). On held-out J-PAS data, SSDA achieves a macro-F1 of 0.83 and a true positive rate of 0.90, versus 0.79/0.85 and 0.73/0.87 for the supervised and mock-only baselines. The gains come mainly from improved quasar classification, especially the high-redshift subclass (F1 = 0.68, versus 0.54 and 0.40 for those baselines), yielding better-calibrated candidate lists for spectroscopic targeting (e.g., WEAVE-QSO) and active galactic nucleus searches. This shows how a few labeled target examples enable robust, data-efficient transfer.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning Galaxies: Formation Evolution Phenomena Stellar planetary and galactic studies

Publication details

Journal / source
The Astrophysical Journal
Volume
1008
Issue
2
Pages
189–189
Publication date
2 September 2026
Language
EN