False Precision in Portfolio Construction: Misconceptions That Undermine Asset Allocation

View at publisher
Authors: Frank J. Fabozzi, Igor Yelnik
Cited by: 1

Abstract

Despite advances in data, models, and analytics, many persistent misconceptions continue to shape multi-asset portfolio construction and asset allocation. This paper argues that these errors are structural rather than informational, arising from the routine use of simplified risk measures, diversification heuristics, and benchmark-relative frameworks in multi-asset strategies. In this article, we examine how commonly used tools, such as volatility, correlation, backtests, and performance metrics, can obscure portfolio-level risk, overstate diversification benefits, and misrepresent strategy robustness, particularly during periods of market stress. The article emphasizes that effective multi-asset allocation relies less on optimization precision and more on judgment, governance, and a clear understanding of how risks interact across assets and strategies over time.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Financial Markets and Investment Strategies Risk and Portfolio Optimization Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling

Publication details

Journal / source
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Publisher
With Intelligence LLC
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
162–177
Publication date
19 January 2026
Language
EN