Accountability or acknowledgment? Untangling authorship and medical writing support in scientific publishing

Read full text
Authors: Hetal V. Shah, Pooja Banerjee, Natasha Das
Cited by: 0
References: 20

Abstract

The evolving landscape of scientific publishing has brought renewed attention to the concepts of authorship, contributorship, and acknowledgments. While authorship is a marker of intellectual contribution and accountability, the role of professional medical writers in the development of scientific and biomedical publications has evolved significantly, particularly in the context of industry-supported research. Drawing upon established guidance such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), Good Publication Practice (GPP) 2022, the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT), and other international standards, this review highlights credible authorship criteria, clarifies the role of medical writers in the publication process, and underscores the necessity of transparent and appropriate acknowledgment of their contribution to a publication. The current frameworks and perspectives are synthesized to support informed decision-making for authors and foster responsible recognition of medical writers as contributors in scientific publishing.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Academic Writing and Publishing Academic integrity and plagiarism Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Publication details

Journal / source
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
108–114
Publication date
28 January 2026
Language
EN