Regulatory Divergence in Autonomous Vehicle Deployment a Comparative Study of the US, EU, and China

View at publisher
Authors: Carlos Lujan Tutusaus, Justin Hidalgo, Oriol Flix
Cited by: 0
References: 6

Abstract

Autonomous vehicle (AV) regulatory frameworks vary significantly across global regions, with the United States, European Union (EU), and China exemplifying distinct approaches. The US adopts a decentralized model, allowing state-level regulation with federal guidance, fostering testing and commercial deployment of Level 4 automation. The EU enforces a harmonized, safety-focused framework under legislation like Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2022/1426, emphasizing structured validation within defined operational domains. China employs a centralized regulatory hierarchy, integrating national standards with localized pilot programs and connected infrastructure. While the US leads in commercial deployment and China advances through coordinated efforts, the EU’s cautious framework is often perceived as a barrier to rapid AV adoption. This paper critically analyzes these regulatory models, emphasizing the need for a robust, harmonized framework that ensures safety and public trust without imposing unnecessary barriers by evaluating the current landscape and future perspectives for effective AV adoption.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Digitalization Law and Regulation Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety Legal and Regulatory Analysis

Publication details

Journal / source
SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility
Volume
08
Issue
3
Pages
1362–1366
Publication date
16 January 2026
Language
EN