Criminal Investigative Analysis

View at publisher
Authors: Sharon Pagaling Hagan
Cited by: 0

Abstract

In solving a problem of this sort, the grand thing is to be able to reason backward. That is a very useful accomplishment, and a very easy one, but people do not practice it much. In the everyday affairs of life it is more useful to reason forward, and so the other comes to be neglected…Let me see if I can make it clearer. Most people, if you describe a train of events to them, will tell you what the result would be. They can put those events together in their minds, and argue from them that something will come to pass. There are few people, however, who, if you told them a result, would be able to evolve from their own inner consciousness what the steps were which led up to that result. This power is what I mean when I talk of reasoning backward, or analytically.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Free Will and Agency Deception detection and forensic psychology Jury Decision Making Processes

Publication details

Pages
262–286
Publication date
5 January 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter