Controversies in Vaccine Policy

View at publisher
Authors: Maya J. Goldenberg
Cited by: 0

Abstract

This chapter frames controversy over vaccine policy, especially vaccine mandates, as value disputes that require deliberative recourse through political channels. The polarizing tendencies of characterizing vaccine opposition as scientific misinformation and defending vaccine policy as “following the science” obscure the value disagreements that need airing and resolution. “Follow the science” policy is shown to be epistemically unjustified and politically illegitimate. Instead, the hard political and policy work of determining legitimate vaccine policy cannot and should not be avoided. Readers may be interested in these Handbook chapters as well: Rebecca Korf and Cailin O'Connor, “Networks and Values”; T. Y. Branch, “Values in Science and Science Communication Models.”

Fields of Study & Subjects

Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Misinformation and Its Impacts Public Health Policies and Education

Publication details

Journal / source
Routledge eBooks
Pages
363–373
Publication date
10 March 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter