The Regulatory Landscape

View at publisher
Authors: Jeremy N. White, M. Filippi
Cited by: 0

Abstract

This chapter describes how nations worldwide are adopting distinctly different strategies for artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, reflecting varying priorities between innovation and ethical governance. The European Union has established itself as a regulatory pioneer through the comprehensive AI Act, which categorises AI systems by risk levels and implements strict compliance requirements, particularly for high-risk applications in areas like healthcare, employment, and law enforcement. The Act emphasises ethical principles including human oversight, transparency, fairness, and environmental sustainability, with full implementation required by 2025. In contrast, the United States has adopted a market-driven approach prioritising innovation and national security. The Trump administration’s repeal of previous AI executive orders and focus on reducing regulatory barriers reflects a strategy aimed at maintaining technological dominance, particularly in competition with China. The UK pursues a principles-based framework, relying on existing sector-specific regulators rather than comprehensive AI legislation. Other nations, including China, Canada, Japan, and Singapore, are developing tailored frameworks that balance innovation with risk management. These diverse approaches highlight the global challenge of reconciling AI&s;s transformative potential with necessary safeguards for privacy, fairness, and accountability in an increasingly AI-driven world.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Digitalization Law and Regulation Ethics and Social Impacts of AI AI and Intellectual Property

Publication details

Journal / source
Routledge eBooks
Pages
47–66
Publication date
3 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter