No Promises in the Rose Garden

View at publisher
Authors: Brian Hobbs
Cited by: 0

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the rarity of policy exceptions, strategic value in building alliances, constraints from domestic politics, and insights into how U.S. foreign policy works with offsets in high-stakes arms deals. This cross-sectional case study examines U.S. Government involvement in Lockheed Martin’s 1997–2000 competition for F-16 sales to the United Arab Emirates, working against France’s Rafale, amid regional tensions with Iran during the post-Gulf War period. The chapter’s title references Vice President Gore prematurely announcing success in 1998 from the White House Rose Garden for a deal that was not yet locked in, highlighting political challenges for government involvement. Evidence supports a three-step process with Emirati offset demands and security needs; Lockheed Martin lobbying for American political alignment; and executive encouragement, including Department of Commerce praise for offsets aligning with White House policy. Putnam’s two-level game unfolded as U.S. officials engaged UAE counterparts on behalf of domestic stakeholders to boost American arms exports. However, Emirati “pre-offset” project requirements minimized U.S. Government intervention. Relative gains concerns – arms market rivalry and UAE burden sharing – drove action. Although offsets served as an important tool of foreign policy, that role emerged even more prominently in later engagement with Poland and India.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Defense Military and Policy Studies International Relations and Foreign Policy Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

Publication details

Journal / source
Routledge eBooks
Pages
68–94
Publication date
5 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter