Mental logic and human irrationality We can put a man on the moon, so why can't we solve those logical-reasoning problems?
Abstract
Are people rational or are they irrational? Before starting to write this paper I posed this question to an undergraduate class in cognitive psychology. No shortage of evidence was offered for either alternative. On the one hand, it was pointed out that people do many things that most of us would judge to be irrational: we fail to wear seatbelts while knowing that this decreases our safety; we smoke cigarettes while knowing that this may lead to a frightful disease; we spend the weekend drinking at parties while knowing that an exam is being given on Monday; we continue to use our credit cards while knowing that we are unable to repay the debts already accumulated. On the other hand, people do many things that reflect a rational nature: we plan for the future, anticipating the effects of our actions; we have created mathematics, formal logic, complex engineering and computing systems, high-technology, science, and philosophy. Ironically, our apparently most rational accomplishments can lead to the most irrational results, for example, modern physics has provided for the development of weapons that threaten to bring about our extinction. For me, the tenor of the discussion was captured when one student posed the popular rhetorical protasis: ‘If we can put a man on the moon’, and another student provided the apodosis, ‘why can’t we solve the THOG problem or the selection task?’
Fields of Study & Subjects
Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Cognitive Science and Education Research
Cognitive Computing and Networks
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Rationality
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Pages
- 110–135
- Publication date
- 19 March 2026
- Language
- EN
- Document type
- Book chapter