Burden-Sharing

View at publisher
Authors: Justin Massie, Barbora Tallová, Nicolas-François Perron, Srdjan Vucetic
Cited by: 0

Abstract

This chapter analyzes variation in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members&s; military assistance to Ukraine (2022–2024), challenging traditional burden-sharing theories that prioritize material capacity and strategic exposure. Employing a between-effects model across 28 allies, the analysis finds that ideational and domestic factors—especially public support—outweigh interest-based drivers. Strategic alignment with the United States and threat perception of Russia also significantly predict contributions, while conventional indicators such as defense spending, arms export capacity, and geographic proximity have no effect. The overall picture marks a departure from Cold War-era burden-sharing practices, indicating that political will, shaped by democratic legitimacy and geopolitical identity, is more decisive than levels of national wealth and defense spending.

Fields of Study & Subjects

European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies Defense Military and Policy Studies International Relations and Foreign Policy

Publication details

Journal / source
Routledge eBooks
Pages
141–159
Publication date
12 January 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter