Apple v. Motorola: admissibility of expert testimony on royalties; injunctive relief

Read full text
Authors: Thomas F. Cotter
Cited by: 0
References: 1

Abstract

In Apple v. Motorola, 757 F.3d 1286 (Fed. Cir. 2014), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for the first time addressed the propriety of injunctive relief for the infringement of FRAND-committed SEPs. The court also addressed issues concerning the admissibility of expert testimony on FRAND royalties and reasonable royalties. Its resolution of both sets of issues, on the facts presented, nevertheless left open several questions that U.S. courts either are still in the process of working through, or have yet to directly confront.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Intellectual Property Law Legal processes and jurisprudence Intellectual Property and Patents

Publication details

Journal / source
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks
Pages
183–199
Publication date
13 January 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter