LRAS: Advanced Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search

Read full text
Authors: Yujin Zhou, Chuxue Cao, Jinluan Yang, Lijun Wu, Conghui He, Sirui Han, Yike Guo
Cited by: 0

Abstract

While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated exceptional logical capabilities in mathematical domains, their application to the legal field remains hindered by the strict requirements for procedural rigor and adherence to legal logic. Existing legal LLMs, which rely on "closed-loop reasoning" derived solely from internal parametric knowledge, frequently suffer from lack of self-awareness regarding their knowledge boundaries, leading to confident yet incorrect conclusions. To address this challenge, we present Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search (LRAS), the first framework designed to transition legal LLMs from static and parametric "closed-loop thinking" to dynamic and interactive "Active Inquiry". By integrating Introspective Imitation Learning and Difficulty-aware Reinforcement Learning, LRAS enables LRMs to identify knowledge boundaries and handle legal reasoning complexity. Empirical results demonstrate that LRAS outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 8.2-32\%, with the most substantial gains observed in tasks requiring deep reasoning with reliable knowledge. We will release our data and models for further exploration soon.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Artificial Intelligence in Law Topic Modeling AI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Publication details

Journal / source
arXiv (Cornell University)
Publication date
12 January 2026
Document type
Preprint