Vaccine Efficacy Estimands Implied by Common Estimators Used in Individual Randomized Field Trials

Read full text
Authors: Michael P. Fay, Dean A. Follmann, Bruce Swihart, Lauren E. Dang
Cited by: 0

Abstract

We review vaccine efficacy (VE) estimands for susceptibility in individual randomized trials with natural (unmeasured) exposure, where individual responses are measured as time from vaccination until an event (e.g., disease from the infectious agent). Common VE estimands are written as $1-θ$, where $θ$ is some ratio effect measure (e.g., ratio of incidence rates, cumulative incidences, hazards, or odds) comparing outcomes under vaccination versus control. Although the ratio effects are approximately equal with low control event rates, we explore the quality of that approximation using a nonparametric formulation. Traditionally, the primary endpoint VE estimands are full immunization (or biological) estimands that represent a subset of the intent-to-treat population, excluding those that have the event before the vaccine has been able to ramp-up to its full effect, requiring care for proper causal interpretation. Besides these primary VE estimands that summarize an effect of the vaccine over the full course of the study, we also consider local VE estimands that measure the effect at particular time points. We discuss interpretational difficulties of local VE estimands (e.g., depletion of susceptibles bias), and using frailty models as sensitivity analyses for the individual-level causal effects over time.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Advanced Causal Inference Techniques Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Publication details

Journal / source
arXiv (Cornell University)
Publication date
26 January 2026
Document type
Preprint