Multi-Source Retrieval and Reasoning for Legal Sentencing Prediction

Read full text
Authors: Junjie Chen, Haitao Li, Qilei Zhang, Zhenghua Li, Ya Zhang, Quan Zhou, Cheng Luo, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, Yueyue Wu, Dongsheng Guo, Qingyao Ai
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Legal judgment prediction (LJP) aims to predict judicial outcomes from case facts and typically includes law article, charge, and sentencing prediction. While recent methods perform well on the first two subtasks, legal sentencing prediction (LSP) remains difficult due to its need for fine-grained objective knowledge and flexible subjective reasoning. To address these limitations, we propose $MSR^2$, a framework that integrates multi-source retrieval and reasoning in LLMs with reinforcement learning. $MSR^2$ enables LLMs to perform multi-source retrieval based on reasoning needs and applies a process-level reward to guide intermediate subjective reasoning steps. Experiments on two real-world datasets show that $MSR^2$ improves both accuracy and interpretability in LSP, providing a promising step toward practical legal AI. Our code is available at https://github.com/cjj826/MSR2.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Artificial Intelligence in Law Topic Modeling Legal processes and jurisprudence

Publication details

Journal / source
arXiv (Cornell University)
Publication date
4 February 2026
Document type
Preprint