Behavioral Economics of AI: LLM Biases and Corrections

Read full text
Authors: Pietro Bini, Lin William Cong, Xing Huang, Lawrence J. Jin
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Do generative AI models, particularly large language models (LLMs), exhibit systematic behavioral biases in economic and financial decisions? If so, how can these biases be mitigated? Drawing on the cognitive psychology and experimental economics literatures, we conduct the most comprehensive set of experiments to date$-$originally designed to document human biases$-$on prominent LLM families across model versions and scales. We document systematic patterns in LLM behavior. In preference-based tasks, responses become more human-like as models become more advanced or larger, while in belief-based tasks, advanced large-scale models frequently generate rational responses. Prompting LLMs to make rational decisions reduces biases.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
arXiv (Cornell University)
Publication date
10 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint