Heterogeneous Elasticities, Aggregation, and Retransformation Bias

Read full text Summarise with VIRAT
Authors: Ellen Munroe, Alexander Newton, Meet Shah
Cited by: 0
References: 14

Summary

No summary yet. VIRAT can read this paper and write a plain-language summary of its aim, methods, key findings and limitations.

Summarise with VIRAT Free to try with your Science Catalogs account.

Abstract

Economists often interpret estimates from linear regressions with log dependent variables as elasticities. However, the coefficients from log-log regressions estimate the elasticity of the geometric mean of $y_i|x_i$, not the arithmetic mean. The unbounded difference between the two is known as retransformation bias and can take either sign. We develop a specification-robust debiased estimator of the average arithmetic elasticity and re-estimate 50 results from top 5 papers published in 2020. We find that 19 are significantly different, with the median absolute difference being 65% of the OLS elasticity estimate. Furthermore, we show standard instrumental variables assumptions with log dependent variables do not identify the elasticity. We specify a control function approach and re-estimate papers that use 2SLS with log dependent variables. We find that 13 of 19 results from top 5 papers are significantly different between the two approaches. Retransformation bias arises as a result of heterogeneous responses. The geometric mean elasticity corresponds to the average response. Arithmetic and geometric means are elements of the power mean family. We show power mean elasticities are sufficient statistics for a common class of decision problems.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Advanced Causal Inference Techniques Advanced Statistical Methods and Models Statistical Methods and Applications

Publication details

Journal / source
arXiv (Cornell University)
Publication date
13 March 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint