O Machismo Nosso De Cada Dia: Análise De Uma Sentença Sobre A Lei Maria Da Penha À Luz Dos Escritos De Ellen White

The present work aims to reflect on the sexism present in a sentence mentioned by the judge Edilson Rumbelsperger Rodrigues, in February 2007. The analysis in this paper is carried out by contrasting the thinking of the judge, declared a Catholic Christian, and that of the American writer Ellen White, also a Protestant Christian. White exposes, every time she addresses questions about gender, the male misconception in understanding the role and place of women in society, especially at home. In view of this, this article confronts the two ways of thinking of the judge and the writer, starting mainly from the belief where both are into, since the judge uses biblical writings to attack someone and the writer uses it to defend someone. For this moment, some fragments of the sentence were selected, in which the magistrate exposes his opposing reasons and through of them we based our analysis. For this, a brief summary of the bases that guide this brief study is convenient, we cited The Treatise on Argumentation: The New Rhetoric, by Chäim Perelmam and Lucy Obrecht-Titeca, supported by other scholars in the field of Discourse and Argumentation.