Uncertainties in recent tropical stratospheric and tropospheric ozone changes restrict our understanding of future total column ozone change

Read full text
Authors: Sean M. Davis, William T. Ball, Yue Jia, Gabriel Chiodo, Justin Alsing, James M. Keeble, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Carlo Arosio, Ewa M. Bednarz, Andreas Chrysanthou, Melanie Coldewey‐Egbers, Robert Damadeo
+31 more Sandip Dhomse, Mohamadou Diallo, Simone Dietmüller, Roland Eichinger, Stacey Frith, Birgit Haßler, Michaela Hegglin, Daan Hubert, Patrick Jöckel, Béatrice Josse, N. A. Kramarova, Diego Loyola, Eliane Maillard Barras, M. Marchand, Olaf Morgenstern, D. A. Plummer, R. W. Portmann, Karen H. Rosenlof, Alexei V. Rozanov, Viktoria Sofieva, J. Staehelin, Timofei Sukhodolov, Kleareti Tourpali, Ronald Johannes Van Der A, H. J. Ray Wang, Krzysztof Wargan, Shingo Watanabe, Mark Weber, Jeannette Wild, Yousuke Yamashita, Jerry R. Ziemke
Cited by: 2

Abstract

Abstract. A variety of chemical and dynamical processes in the troposphere and stratosphere affect tropical total column ozone (TCO), the net effect of which may cause changes in surface UV radiation and impact human and ecosystem health. We use dynamical linear modeling to estimate tropical trends in TCO and partial column ozone (PCO) in the troposphere and three stratospheric layers to assess agreement between satellite observational composites and chemistry–climate model (CCM) simulations from two multi-model experiments (CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022). While both model experiments show tropical TCO increases over 2000–2021, CCMI–2022 trends (+2.5 DU) agree slightly better with observations than CCMI-1 (+1.6 DU). However, this overall agreement obscures multiple systematic differences in PCO trends between the models and observations across atmospheric layers. For example, since 2000 tropical tropospheric PCO increased significantly in CCMI-2022 (+1.5 DU) but not in CCMI–1 (+0.3 DU), largely explaining the difference in TCO trends. Also, despite nearly identical stratospheric PCO trends, CCMI-2022 trends are slightly more negative in the lower stratospheric (by ~0.5 DU), compensated by more positive middle/upper stratosphere trends compared to CCMI-1. Crucially, substantial differences exist across observational PCO trends, particularly in the troposphere and middle/upper stratosphere, and these disagreements limit the ability to evaluate CCM fidelity. Furthermore, while the inter-model correlation between late and early 21st century trends is suggestive of a potential emergent constraint on future ozone trends, the spread in observational trends precludes its observational implementation.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Atmospheric Ozone and Climate Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols Climate Change and Geoengineering

Publication details

Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Publication date
26 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint