Surrogate modelling as enabling methodology for predictive Digital Twins in geohazards

Read full text
Authors: Anil Yıldiz, Julia Kowalski
Cited by: 0

Abstract

An informed-decision making in managing risks due to climate-driven hazards for emergency response, designing preventive interventions, or policymaking for future requires either short-term and scenario-based assessments or long-term and uncertain assessments. Data requirements, spatial and temporal scales, observations required, and modelling techniques employed change drastically depending on the scope of the risk assessment. Digital twins (DT) in applications for natural hazards provide a great opportunity for significant improvements in disaster management. What makes DTs possible today is various technological advancements such as embedded sensors, cloud computing, edge computing, IoT. However, DTs also require a digital representation of the physical counterpart, mostly in the form of a computational or a data-driven model, to be able to predict future states. The utilisation of complex computational models in DTs is generally hindered by their relatively high computational budget and runtimes. A pathway to involve such models in (near) real-time decisions in DTs for geohazards is surrogate modelling. They are statistically valid representations of the computational model, into which physical laws and constraints can be embedded. Physics-compliant, physics-based or physics-informed surrogate models can facilitate DTs with i) instantaneous predictions, ii) the ability to conduct uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis to ensure reliability, iii) online updating of model parameters based on advanced calibration routines, iv) increased trust due to explainability based on physical laws. We present herein surrogate modelling as an enabler to replace computational models predicting the runout behaviour of geophysical flows. We investigate their applicability in uncertainty quantification, global sensitivity analysis, Bayesian parameter estimation, Bayesian model selection, and optimal experimental design. We demonstrate our workflow with two open-source computational models, r.avaflow 4.0 and synxflow, with synthetic and real-world case studies.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Model Reduction and Neural Networks Landslides and related hazards Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

Publication details

Journal / source
EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts
Publication date
14 March 2026
Language
EN