Entanglement as Interaction: Resolving Einstein's Concern Through the Cohesion UFT Operator Framework

Einstein’s primary objection to quantum mechanics was the paradox he called “spookyaction at a distance” [1]: the apparent instantaneous influence of a measurement on one particleupon the state of its entangled partner, regardless of their separation. Bell’s theorem [2] andsubsequent photon polarisation experiments [3] confirmed that entanglement is real and thatno local hidden variable theory can reproduce its correlations. The conceptual gap persists:how can quantum coherence be maintained without signalling?This paper proposes a resolution grounded in the Cohesion unified field theory [5].Entanglement is reframed not as mysterious instantaneous transmission but as a sharedevolutionary rhythm maintained by the Cohesion UFT’s operator system. Entangled particlesdo not send signals; they share a common structural cadence established at the momentof their joint genesis and sustained by the Continuance operator until a new interactionintroduces a new cadence.Version 2 adds the geometric picture of that shared cadence: two entangled particlesshare a common funneled-spring structure established at creation. Their torsion cycles arephase-locked by the Continuance operator. Measurement — Collapse — is the momentone spring’s slip event resolves the joint state. This geometry connects the entanglementframework directly to the fine-structure constant series [11], in which the same funneled-springtorsion mechanism determines the gap between the golden angle and 1/α.The Cohesion UFT’s four-operator framework for entanglement — Surplus, Collapse,Continuance, and Calibration — is developed formally. Bell inequality violations are consistentwith the rhythm picture. Fuentes’ results on relativistic quantum information [4] directlysupport the Continuance operator’s prediction.