Voice Anonymization in Journalism - A Study on Listener Perception of Technologically Altered Speech

The appendices referenced in this thesis are not reproduced in full in the document for readability and due to their length. · A Answers from the open-ended questions o A1 - Scenario 1 - Deep Robotic - Overall impression o A2 - Scenario 1 - Deep Robotic - Perception of Interviewee o A3 - Scenario 1 - TTS Neutral - Overall impression o A4 - Scenario 1 - TTS Neutral - Perception of Interviewee o A5 - Scenario 1 - TTS Natural - Overall impression o A6 - Scenario 1 - TTS Natural - Perception of Interviewee o A7 - Scenario 1 - S2S - Overall impression o A8 - Scenario 1 - S2S - Perception of Interviewee o A9 - Scenario 2 - High Pitch - Effect on Participants o A10 - Scenario 2 - High Pitch - Perceived Excessiveness or Appropriateness o A11 - Scenario 2 - Low Pitch - Effect on Participants o A12 - Scenario 2 - Low Pitch - Perceived Excessiveness or Appropriateness o A13 - Scenario 2 - S2S - Effect on Participants o A14 - Scenario 2 - S2S - Perceived Excessiveness and Appropriateness o A15 - Scenario 2 - TTS Neutral - Effect on Participants o A16 - Scenario 2 - TTS Neutral - Perceived Excessiveness and Appropriateness · B Results spreadsheet · C Stimuli o C1 - Scenario 1: Deep Robotic o C2 - Scenario 1: TTS Neutral o C3 - Scenario 1: TTS Natural o C4 - Scenario 1: S2S o C5 - Scenario 2: High Pitch o C6 - Scenario 2: Low Pitch o C7 - Scenario 2: S2S o C8 - Scenario 2: TTS Neutral o C9 - Scenario 1: Baseline audio o C10 - Scenario 2: Baseline audio · D - Survey questionnaire