" الذكاء الاصطناعي كأداة جديدة للعدالة " Artificial intelligence: Anew Tool for Justice

Abstract: AI is often a system of self-learning and therefore constantly evolving But if you learn AI software based on misleading views or erroneous previous court decisions, These systemic errors will be reflected in future AI decisions and, for example, AI may recognize witnesses' credibility based on objective features such as accurate facial expressions, and are therefore less likely to be guided by subjective impressions, but - Apart from raising potential new data protection problems, the assessment of evidence by the judge in civil proceedings has high value and great importance and has a significant impact on the proper functioning of justice. If judicial decision-making is transferred entirely to artificial intelligence, the individuality necessary to make a decision on a case-by-case basis will be lost, legal development will cease and case law will disappear. Moreover, any judicial decision must be taken by a human being rather than a robot. In this context, special emphasis must be placed on the Constitution, which guarantees the independence of a judge. Artificial intelligence connects data and makes decisions based on algorithms and probabilities. But algorithms that operate artificial intelligence are programmed by engineers, so who is responsible for AI decisions? Judge? Or the engineer????? Especially if the algorithm is not detected, it will be difficult or impossible to understand, question, verify or control a decision made by AI only even if the judge uses the AI tool as a supporter, how can he assess the results of AI if he does not understand how the AI assisted software reached his decision?!!!!!! So, one of the primary issues is whether the computer software or automated process has the legal authority to make the applicable decisions from a human judge but how are they? and who has the legal authority to make such a decision is a computer programmer, policy maker, human decision maker, computer or automated system itself? AI is certainly more than just legal technology and therefore The use of AI in law would be a very rapid, instantaneous development, not a revolution, and the integration of AI into judicial systems, The legal profession has been experimental so far, but at the same time it is developing rapidly. So early adopters will have a great advantage over the judicial systems, bodies, and institutions that are late in adopting technology. Judges, lawyers, bodies, and institutions that have not been involved in the shift towards artificial intelligence will be left behind and they will pay the bill for delays in their presence in the arena of law if not at every moment that robots develop In the end, they will be displaced and forever from the arena of law. Artificial intelligence will change the way judges, lawyers and all those interested in law think. and the way they do business and the way they interact with their issues, but how? The full text of the book is available through the official publisher (Democratic Arab Center – Berlin) at:https://www.democraticac.de/?p=92680