ריאליזם מערכתי אינטגרטיבי: מסגרת אנליטית לעיון במבני אידאולוגיה, מוסר ושליטה!

This working paper introduces Integrative Systemic Realism (ISTR) as an analytical framework for addressing a central problem of contemporary thought: the erosion of structural intelligibility in social, moral, and cognitive analysis. Rather than treating current crises as primarily political, ideological, or normative, the paper diagnoses a deeper epistemic failure—the loss of the capacity to relate phenomena, concepts, and values within coherent structural frameworks. ISTR is presented as a realist, systemic, and integrative approach. It rejects both positivist reductions of truth to isolated empirical measurements and postmodern dissolutions of truth into unbounded narrative pluralism. Instead, it advances a layered epistemic model grounded in the distinction between structural conditions of intelligibility and their contextual, historical manifestations. The paper outlines the core epistemic assumptions of ISTR and sketches its main analytical axes, including: IMS (Inversion–Metastasis–Sublimation) as a model of structural transformation, DTS (Dharma–Theism–Secularism) as a tool for tracing the migration of normative structures,a psycho-ethical axis linking moral structures to cognitive and affective dynamics,and CGT (Cognitive Gynocentric Telegony), introduced cautiously as a deep symbolic–cognitive transmission axis. Crucially, the paper clarifies that ISTR does not engage in narrative or theological syncretism. References to Hasidic Breslov thought, Dzogchen Buddhism, and Lurianic Kabbalah are used analytically, not comparatively, to extract structural invariants of reality and cognition that recur across independent traditions. These invariants are treated as conditions enabling diverse traditions and narratives, not as products of them. As a working paper, the document is intentionally non-exhaustive. It serves as an entry point for the Hebrew-speaking reader into a broader theoretical corpus developed in German and English, and invites further analytical application, critique, and interdisciplinary development rather than offering final conclusions.