tz-dev/PMS-EDEN: PMS–EDEN: Structural Drift, Pseudo-Symmetry & Reciprocity Loss

Read full text
Authors: tz-dev
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Overview This release publishes the first draft of PMS–EDEN, an operator-conform praxeological reconstruction of Eden as a minimal test scene for tracing structural drift from praxis coordination into comparison, pseudo-symmetry, and reciprocity loss. Key points Eden as praxeological ground state: Eden is specified as structurally complete with A (Awareness) = [Θ, □, Δ] available without deficit pressure (not "naivety" / not "pre-maturity"). Fall as structural interruption (not epistemic gain): The breach is modeled as an operator-chain interruption where enactment proceeds under ∇ within □ without Σ/Ψ carrying the act. The breach "teaches nothing"—it activates a consequence field rather than producing knowledge. Consequence field activation: Post-breach legibility becomes irreversible under Ω (asymmetry), Θ (temporality), and Λ (non-event/remainder). Drift grammar: The paper traces how comparison-dominant framing (□) under real Ω yields pseudo-symmetry (rhetorical parity over persistent asymmetry) and escalating reciprocity loss (Σ/Ψ failure under Ω). Gender roles as structural roles (non-essentialist): "Man/Woman" are treated as praxis roles under Ω (capacity/exposure/obligation gradients), not as ontological or psychological essences. Chapter Closure protocol: Each chapter ends with a stabilization block (Structural Result / Cost Distribution / Rational Response Envelope / Reader-Guard) to prevent moralizing, psychologizing, and person-evaluative misreadings. Spec & guardrails PMS_1.1 conformant: Uses only the operator set Δ–Ψ and the ACRED axes definitions; no additional operators introduced. Non-theological, non-psychological, non-normative: Eden is treated as text-as-praxis; the analysis is descriptive, not prescriptive. Entry condition for application: Any binding/prescriptive use remains subject to Χ + reversibility + D (distance, reversibility, dignity-in-practice). Suggested citation Zöller, T. (2026). PMS–EDEN: Structural Drift from Praxis to Comparison, Pseudo-Symmetry, and Reciprocity Loss (Draft v0.1.0).

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
5 January 2026