Hardware Report of 0DSTL GenX vs Default Qubits Torrisi Sebastiano — GenX *hardware Only* Simple-Correlations-comparison V1

V1 GenX Simple-Correlations-comparison V1 GenX interakt vs Default Qubits hardware Only comparison. Description: The presented results demonstrate that the GenX approach provides a more stable and information-rich characterization of long-range correlations on current IBM Quantum hardware compared to actively entangling default circuits. Importantly, these experiments were performed on general-purpose superconducting quantum processors, which are not explicitly optimized for minimal residual coupling or coherence-preserving collective observables. Despite this, GenX consistently shows: reduced sensitivity to gate-induced noise, lower accumulation of correlated errors, and more reproducible behavior across different qubit pairs and backends. This behavior can be attributed to the deliberate avoidance of deep entangling gate sequences and the reliance on shallow, coherence-preserving circuit structures. By operating in a regime of weaker effective coupling, GenX minimizes the impact of crosstalk, calibration drift, and multi-qubit error propagation that typically limit scalability in NISQ devices. these the results suggest that: For certain classes of global observables, hardware diagnostics, and collective quantum effects, protocols based on minimal coupling and shallow circuit depth may scale to larger qubit counts without full quantum error correction. Moreover, it is reasonable to expect that dedicated hardware designs—explicitly engineered to further suppress unwanted residual coupling and enhance coherence—could significantly extend this regime. On such tailored platforms, GenX-like approaches may enable larger-scale, stable quantum measurements beyond what is currently feasible with standard entangling circuit architectures, even in the absence of full QEC. In this context, the present study should be understood as a foundational benchmark, demonstrating the feasibility and advantages of low-coupling, shallow-depth strategies on existing hardware, and motivating future exploration on hardware-software co-designed quantum systems. Conclusion Although the evaluated hardware is not optimized for GenX-style low-coupling operation, the results already show a clear and consistent pattern. Once notation and idealized models are separated from physical reality, the observed behavior aligns with fundamental hardware physics rather than abstract assumptions. Strong, enforced entanglement is often presented as a justification for extreme qubit redundancy (e.g., 1:1000 or higher) through error correction. While this approach may appear mathematically consistent in idealized models, the physical behavior observed on real hardware shows the opposite trend: strong coupling accelerates error accumulation, cross-disturbance, and instability. In contrast, low-coupling architectures preserve structure and correlations more efficiently under realistic noise conditions. This work therefore highlights a critical distinction: notation does not equal physics, and conclusions drawn purely from models may fail under real hardware constraints. Further independent evaluations are currently underway and will be published in due course, covering both real quantum hardware and large-scale simulations. Witness W is not a meaningful risk metric for GenX GenX is interaction-driven, not Bell-driven & not deep entangled.Therefore Bell/GHZ witnesses are not risk metrics — they are category errors.In this context, a value of W = 0 does not indicate risk or classical behavior — it simply means that Bell-style witnesses are not applicable.You don’t mitigate Bell risk — you delete it from the design space. What matters instead are metrics like:– XX per noise– XX per depth– overall hardware efficiencyThis shifts quantum validation away from “maximum Bell violation”toward robust, low-depth, hardware-realistic quantum behavior — exactly what NISQ systems need today. Files: Hardware benchmark GenxVsDefault.py Results GenX_Interakt_vs_Default_Simple.docx GenX is directly testable on current QC hardware.It requires very little code, since it does not rely on strong entanglement, QEC, or deep control stacks.This makes quick, practical comparisons feasible without heavy setup. Join the 0DSTL Architecture Community: A physically based, deterministic architecture built around 0DSTL.Researchers can submit prototypes, simulation results, implementation studies, and related computational models. 🔗 0DSTL GenX: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17795203 For submissions or review requests, please contact:📎 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastiano-torrisi-06073a2a1/📧 Email: info@0dstl.de OR 🔗 Community: https://zenodo.org/communities/0dstl-architecture Usage & LicensingThe script GenxVsDefault.py is provided for free use for non-commercial purposes, including research, benchmarking, and educational applications.The underlying GenX architecture and design principles are considered a separate work and may be subject to independent licensing or future protection.Use of this script does not grant rights to the GenX architecture itself, or other estimated 0DSTL architecture parts.