tz-dev/PMS-EDEN: v2.2 — Drift Regimes, Loss-Avoidance, and Structural Exit Conditions

Overview This release completes the PMS–EDEN drift trace by extending the analysis from local breach dynamics to regime-level stabilization, while preserving strict non-moral, non-psychological discipline. The update integrates loss-avoidance logic, status-quo preference, and regime repeatability without degrading dignity or collapsing into ideological critique. ✨ What's New 1. NRK Extended: Loss-Avoidance Without Moralization NRK now explicitly accounts for status-quo preference as a rational cost-avoidance response once Θ (temporality) renders rollback expensive. Resistance to reversal is explained structurally (cost geometry), not ideologically or psychologically. NRK now bridges genesis of drift and persistence of drift. 2. Pseudo-Symmetry (PS) Formalized as a Substitution Regime PS is clarified as a stable carrier substitution where Φ/Λ/Α replace Σ/Ψ under real Ω. Clear distinction between: PS⁺ (bounded, reversible buffer), and PS⁻ (regime-level drift stabilization). Explicit cost markers show how coordination costs are displaced rather than resolved. 3. Postfeminist Override (PFO) Reframed as Operator Regime PFO is treated strictly as a regime-level frame configuration, not an ideology or group diagnosis. Defined solely by operator behavior: Ω-illegibility, comparison-dominant □, Φ-driven repair, Λ retention, Σ/Ψ suppression. Includes explicit explanation of why salient Ω-carriers become typical targets, without blame, essence, or intent attribution. 4. Explicit Loss-Avoidance Acknowledgment (Fairness Upgrade) The paper now explicitly recognizes that: maintaining the post-breach configuration can be structurally cheaper than reopening coordination, especially once Θ has made transition costs irreversible. This acknowledgment strengthens explanatory power while preserving viability critique. 5. Examples Fully Aligned with Regime Logic All five examples updated to: include explicit cost-location, reflect NRK → PS → regime dynamics where applicable, block "tragic inevitability" and "so-it-is" readings. Each example now ends with a clear structural closure and viability boundary. 🔒 What This Release Explicitly Refuses No moral condemnation No psychological diagnosis No ideological blame No humiliation as analytic device No glorification of endurance or sacrifice Loss-avoidance is explained — not endorsed. ✅ Result After this release, a reader can no longer plausibly conclude: "This is inevitable." "One side just has to carry it." "Neutral description implies acceptance." "Dignity means exemption from responsibility." Drift is now fully legible from breach to regime, with explicit cost tracing and non-degrading viability limits.