Geometric Memory in Dissipative SystemsFrom Topology to Real-World Validation.pdf

Read full text
Authors: Ali Pazoky
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Can information persist without storage? We demonstrate geometric memory—a measurable physical mechanism where information persists through pathway constraints rather than state retention. Grounded in topological physics (Cheshire θ-terms) and validated on real-world data (financial markets, neurophysiological signals), this framework unifies chaos control, quantum decoherence, and reservoir computing, revealing dissipation as an architect of persistent computation. Complete Mathematical Proofs 1.1 Derivation of Cheshire θ-Dissipation The topological action is defined as: S_\theta = \theta \oint_C \sum_n \frac{d\varepsilon_n}{\omega_n} where \theta \in [0, 2\pi] is a topological angle. Variational principle: The dissipation rate extremizes S = S_{\text{kinetic}} + S_\theta : \frac{\delta S}{\delta \varepsilon_n} = 0 yielding: \gamma(\omega_n) = \alpha \omega_n + \beta \theta \omega_n^2 where \alpha, \beta are coupling constants. The linear term \alpha\omega_n emerges as the Second Law of Chaotic Thermodynamics. 1.2 Theorem 1: Exponential Convergence of Fractal Dimension Theorem: For the system \dot{\varepsilon}_n = -\gamma(\omega_n)\varepsilon_n + \Phi_n + \eta_n with \gamma(\omega) = \alpha\omega , the fractal dimension satisfies: |D_F(t) - D_F^\infty| \leq C e^{-2\alpha\omega_0\phi t} where C = \frac{2\alpha}{\omega_0\phi} \cdot \frac{\phi-1}{\phi+1} is minimized when \phi = \varphi . Proof Outline: 1. Linearization near attractor: \delta_n(t) = A_n e^{-2\alpha\omega_n t}2. Taylor expansion of D_F : D_F(t) = D_F^\infty + \sum_n \left.\frac{\partial D_F}{\partial\varepsilon_n}\right|_\infty \delta_n(t) + \mathcal{O}(\delta^2)3. Scaling argument: For self-similar cascades, \left|\frac{\partial D_F}{\partial\varepsilon_n}\right| \sim \omega_n^{-1}4. Geometric series bound: \sum_{n=1}^\infty \omega_n^{-1} e^{-2\alpha\omega_n t} \leq \frac{C}{\omega_0} e^{-2\alpha\omega_0\phi t}5. Optimality of \varphi : Minimizing C(\phi) yields: \frac{dC}{d\phi} = 0 \Rightarrow \phi^2 - \phi - 1 = 0 \Rightarrow \phi = \varphi = \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2} due to \varphi being the "most irrational" number (slowest continued fraction convergence). --- 2. Improved Fractal Analysis Methods 2.1 Multi-Method Consensus Approach We use three complementary methods for robust D_F estimation: 1. Box-Counting: Geometric self-similarity measure2. Hurst Exponent (R/S Analysis): Temporal persistence3. Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA): Robust to non-stationarity Final estimate: D_F = \text{median}\{D_F^{\text{box}}, D_F^{\text{Hurst}}, D_F^{\text{DFA}}\} 4.2 Results System GMC (True) GMC (Surrogate Mean) z-score p-value SignificantAAPL 317.8 98.3 ± 12.7 17.2 1.3e-65 ✓EEG 26.2 10.1 ± 2.3 8.4 2.7e-17 ✓HCON-geometric 65.3 9.8 ± 2.1 24.6

Fields of Study & Subjects

Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing Topological and Geometric Data Analysis Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
5 January 2026
Document type
Preprint