tz-dev/PMS-EDEN: PMS–EDEN v2.3 — Terminological Integrity, EDEN-MAP Finalization, and Pattern Library Closure

Read full text
Authors: tz-dev
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Overview This release completes the terminological, methodological, and structural consolidation of PMS–EDEN. All remaining cross-model leakage, ambiguous labels, and under-specified pattern language have been fully removed. v2.3 marks the point at which PMS–EDEN becomes: terminologically closed, methodologically self-auditing, and safe against coercive or diagnostic misuse. No new operators or explanatory claims are added. The contribution of this release is integrity. ✨ What's New 1. Full Removal of Cross-Model Contamination (IA / Axis Artifacts) All remnants of non-PMS models have been permanently removed: ❌ Inadult Asymmetry (IA) ❌ IA-Box ❌ Interpretation Axis / Imbalance Axis ❌ any implied maturity scores, deficit logic, or evaluative scaling PMS–EDEN now uses only: PMS operators Δ–Ψ ACRED axes A/C/R/E/D exactly as defined in PMS_1.1 explicitly declared paper-internal composites (e.g. NRK, PS) No renaming, softening, or substitution was performed. Invalid constructs are fully excised, not rebranded. 2. EDEN-MAP Finalized as a Question-Only Mapping Protocol (§15) EDEN-MAP is now fully locked as a descriptive, non-binding protocol: Six core questions (Q1–Q6) covering: □ (frame) Ω (asymmetry) Λ (non-event) Χ (distance) Σ (integration) Ψ (self-binding) Mandatory scene packet and one-page synthesis formats Explicit diagnostics-to-action firewall EDEN-MAP cannot be used for: person evaluation, inner-state inference, moral judgment, or obligation enforcement. Any binding use remains invalid without Χ + reversibility + D. 3. Pattern Library Closed and Disciplined (§13) The Pattern Library is now complete and internally consistent: All patterns follow the C5 discipline: Trigger configuration Primary stabilizer Primary failure No pattern encodes: traits, maturity levels, diagnoses, or evaluative axes "Pseudo-maturity" is strictly defined as Σ-simulation, not development failure Patterns are recognition tools, not prescriptions. 4. Glossary Hardened and Exhaustive (§16) The glossary now provides: full operator-conform definitions, non-psychological clauses for all potentially loaded terms, strict separation between: enactment vs E (action), symmetry vs reciprocity, restraint vs domination. Every term used in the paper is now: defined once, used consistently, and constrained against misuse. 5. Boundary Conditions & Alternatives Completed (§17–18) PMS–EDEN now explicitly states: where the drift grammar applies strongly, weakly, or not at all, multiple sufficient alternative explanations (AE1–AE3), no exclusivity or totalizing ambition. Applicability limits explanatory force — not viability criteria. 🔒 What This Release Explicitly Refuses No psychological explanation No maturity or deficit scoring No person diagnosis No ideological or group attribution No coercive or irreversible application of PMS vocabulary No "neutrality = acceptance" loophole Structural description does not authorize binding. ✅ Result After v2.3, a critical reader can no longer plausibly claim: "Key terms are undefined or imported." "This smuggles in another model." "Patterns diagnose people." "Maturity is being scored." "Description quietly licenses coercion." PMS–EDEN is now operator-closed, audit-ready, and misuse-resistant. 📌 Migration Note No PMS operators were changed. No ACRED definitions were altered. All changes concern terminology discipline, method closure, and misuse prevention. Earlier analyses remain readable. Analyses using removed terms (IA, axis logic) are now formally invalid under v2.3.

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
6 January 2026