tz-dev/PMS-SEX: PMS–SEX v1.1 — Model Addon

This release marks the formal consolidation of PMS–SEX as a complete, PMS-conform application profile for the analysis of sexual praxis — including its machine-readable specification, human-readable model spec, and worked example suite. PMS–SEX is built strictly on the canonical Praxeological Meta-Structure (PMS, Δ–Ψ) and introduces no new operators, no redefinitions, and no dependency changes. It is the fourth full domain application of PMS, following PMS-EDEN, PMS-LOGIC, and PMS-ANTICIPATION. 🔹 What this release delivers 1. A complete structural grammar of sexuality (paper) Sexuality reconstructed as enacted configuration, not as identity, morality, psychology, or preference Focus on what configurations produce over time: stabilization and repetition (Α) asymmetry and cost layouts (Ω) temporal accumulation and exit realism (Θ) non-events and absence as steering forces (Λ) distance and stop-capability as viability conditions (Χ) self-binding and meaning pressure (Ψ) Explicit refusal of person-typing, diagnosis, or normative ranking 2. PMS–SEX.yaml — Application Profile (machine-readable) A formal PMS application profile that: depends explicitly on PMS.yaml (schema_version: PMS_1.1) introduces: reduced signatures (chapter-level minimal formulas), a drift catalogue (predictable dysfunction markers), viability corridors (governability criteria, not norms), modulators (operator weightings without typing), a minimal psychology adapter (alarm only, no explanation), an example-suite schema for uniform case mappings enforces the PMS entry condition: Χ (distance) + reversibility + D (dignity-in-practice) This makes PMS–SEX reusable in tooling, comparison, and further research without re-implementing PMS. 3. Human-readable Model Specification (HTML & PDF) New in this release: Model Specification (HTML) — technical prose rendering of PMS-SEX.yaml Model Specification (PDF) — print-stable reference Both aligned with: PMS conventions, PMS-ANTICIPATION / PMS-CRITIQUE spec style, explicit non-goals and validity gates These files clarify: scope, non-promises, operator roles, drift and risk handling, and correct application discipline. 4. Five fully worked example cases (structural stress tests) The example suite is not illustrative and not prescriptive. Each case is a scene-bound operator mapping designed to stress-test the model: Consent That Survives Legally but Fails Structurally Desire as Self-Punishment (Minimal Psychology Trigger) Suspended Binding That Quietly Becomes Possession High Intensity + Narrative Safety Dignity Collapse without Rule Violation Across the examples, PMS–SEX shows that: drift is usually structurally prepared, not sudden, harm can arise without bad intent, dignity can collapse without rule violation, and binding can emerge without explicit agreement. 🔹 What PMS–SEX explicitly does not do No diagnosis, no typology, no therapy No moral ranking, shaming, or person evaluation No prescriptions, how-tos, optimization, or safety manuals No claims about inner motives, desires, or experiential essence PMS–SEX evaluates configurations, not people. 🔹 Why this matters Sexuality is one of the most moralized and psychologized domains of practice. PMS–SEX shows that many conflicts, harms, and collapses arise without malice, simply because: time accumulates (Θ), asymmetry redistributes costs (Ω), frames narrow (□), distance erodes (Χ), and binding emerges where it was never agreed (Ψ). This release makes those dynamics: readable without humiliation, and criticizable without moral theater. 📦 Included in this release Canonical paper .md, .html, .pdf PMS-SEX.yaml (application profile) Model Specification .html + .pdf Five structurally uniform example mappings Structural appendices (Glossary, Structural Map, Limits & Extensions) Iconic black-and-white PMS-SEX cover mark PMS–SEX does not make sexuality safe, good, or pure. It makes visible where costs emerge, how drift stabilizes, and why exit often comes too late. License: CC BY 4.0 Status: Stable · PMS-conform (PMS_1.1)