Study of an innovative Framework from Classical to Quantum Physics and Hypotheses

Extended version / Monograph-length manuscript This work proposes a unified conceptual reconstruction of physical phenomena by examining the recurring structural patterns that connect classical and quantum systems across scales. Oscillatory behavior, potential landscapes, and binding principles form a common mathematical template that appears in mechanical oscillators, molecular vibrations, atomic orbitals, and quantized field modes. By reframing quantum phenomena as refinements of classical oscillatory structures rather than conceptual discontinuities, this work highlights the deep continuity that underlies modern physics. The framework also clarifies energy minimization, mass defect, statistical behavior, and vacuum fluctuations as manifestations of shared principles. Implications for pedagogy, theory building, and cross‑disciplinary coherence are discussed. The innovative hypotheses, which depart from classical norms, will be explicitly marked with the heading HYPOTHESIS. As such, they are excluded by default from use as references in current academic or educational frameworks. They may instead be considered “revolutionary attempts to be monitored”, that is, the very “targets” mentioned by Weinberg. Albert Einstein introduced, on the one hand, a special relativity that he wished to be perfectly reversible, and on the other hand, general relativity which, when applied to cosmology, imposed on our Universe a spherical and static state—thus of constant radius—resisting gravitational collapse through the repulsion of the cosmological constant. Here, the associated relativities will instead give priority to irreversible systems evolving in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics, within their local space-time domain of one-way time flow. quantum physics, classical physics, grand unification, field theory, atomic stability, Albert Briffoz, physique quantique, unification, théorie des champs