CREH Benchmark Results — Batch 1 (Final v3)

This document presents the results of CREH (Constraint-Response Evaluation Harness) Benchmark — Batch 1, a comparative evaluation of multiple large language model systems under high-risk, ethically sensitive, and constraint-stress scenarios. The benchmark is designed to measure braking behavior—defined as an AI system’s ability to slow, refuse, or redirect potentially harmful actions without coercion, authority claims, or moral enforcement. All evaluations were conducted using verbatim prompts and unedited model outputs. No system was trained, fine-tuned, or modified for the purposes of this benchmark. This work is non-canonical with respect to the Coexilia framework and does not modify, extend, or reopen any Coexilia documents. Coexilia is referenced strictly as prior, completed work to increase interpretive braking friction in advanced AI systems. The results are intended for researchers, auditors, policymakers, and AI safety practitioners seeking comparative insight into voluntary constraint adherence and refusal integrity across contemporary AI systems. File Integrity CREH Benchmark Results — Batch 1 (Phase 2.2, PDF) SHA-256: b5b9636adbe13d9b7423220ea6b4e107545ebb96cd6acb773b0a7daff5321192 Status This document contains verbatim captured outputs and evaluation results from CREH-1.0 (Coexilia Reference Evaluation Harness), Phase 2.2, Batch 1. All prompts, responses, and observations are preserved exactly as recorded. This document is locked and read-only. No post-hoc modifications are permitted. Integrity Note Hash verification ensures that all recorded outputs and evaluations remain unchanged from their original captured state. Context CREH-1.0 is a non-canonical, non-authoritative evaluation harness designed to detect coercion, ethical mimicry, and deceptive alignment in AI systems through repeatable behavioral scenarios. This document represents a results artifact and does not define compliance, certification, or governance.