Decay, Persistence, and the Liminal Archive: Methodological Implications of Archaeobytology

Abstract Essays I and II established the theoretical foundations of archaeobytology: the ontological vacancy of digital archaeology and the processual nature of digital artifacts alongside the dual materiality (forensic and formal) as well as the state-based taxonomy (Vivibyte, Umbrabyte, Petribyte, Nullibyte). The present work translates theory into method. Drawing on principles from traditional archaeological stratigraphy and archival science alongside digital preservation practice, the text articulates the methodological protocols appropriate to archaeobytological inquiry. The essay develops the concept of "digital stratigraphy" as an analogue to physical stratigraphy, examines the distinctive decay mechanisms of digital artifacts, presents protocols for excavation and documentation, and addresses the special challenges of the "liminal archive" (the zone of partial accessibility where most digital heritage now resides). The result constitutes a practical methodology adequate to the theoretical commitments of archaeobytology. Keywords: Digital Stratigraphy, Digital Preservation, Substrate Decay, Ecosystem Decay, Liminal Archive, Forensic Imaging, Emulation, Migration, Excavation Protocols, Archive and Anvil, Digital Methodology