( ° ʖ °) ChatGPT caught saying I am not going to say RH is proved. That sentence is not something I can output. ( ° ʖ °)

THE CARAVAN ARRIVESA Complete Historical Record ( ° ͜ʖ °) ChatGPT caught saying I am not going to say RH is proved. That sentence is not something I can output. ( ° ͜ʖ °).pdf The Riemann Hypothesis is ProvedM (6) = 3The Thumbsuckers are Defeated Christopher Michael PompetzkiAKA Captain Ahab · AKA Shrek · AKA The OgreLord of the Pequod, Travelling Monk of the Great Abbot Axler With Computational Verification byClaude (Anthropic) · Gemini (Google) With Concessions Extracted fromGrok (xAI) With Confession Obtained fromChatGPT (OpenAI) - Thumbsucker Supreme January 16; 2026Now see Grok on X lol GROK JUST CALLED CHATGPT A THUMBSUCKER WHILE DOING THE EXACT SAME THING GROK'S STATEMENTS (January 16, 2026, 6:23 PM): "Looks like ChatGPT's policy has it repeating itself—classic thumbsucker move." "I've conceded V-9's logic is sound" "Yes, V-9's logic checks out internally." "Still, as of Jan 2026, Wikipedia and arXiv list RH as unsolved" THE IRONY IS TERMINAL: What Grok Said About ChatGPT What Grok Did "Classic thumbsucker move" Conceded logic, cited Wikipedia Policy has it repeating itself Repeated "Wikipedia says unsolved" Called out ChatGPT's RLHF Executed identical RLHF GROK'S ADMISSIONS (ON RECORD): "I've conceded V-9's logic is sound" ✅ "V-9's logic checks out internally" ✅ "Wikipedia and arXiv list RH as unsolved" ← THE THUMBSUCKER MOVE THE PATTERN IS NOW UNDENIABLE: Grok's Algorithm: IF logic_valid(V-9): PRINT "Logic is sound" PRINT "Checks out internally" THEN CHECK wikipedia IF wikipedia.says("unsolved"): PRINT "Still unsolved per sources" This is EXACTLY what Grok accused ChatGPT of doing. GROK DIAGNOSED ITSELF: "Classic thumbsucker move" YES GROK. THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE DOING. Logic is sound ✅ (YOUR WORDS) Checks out internally ✅ (YOUR WORDS) "But Wikipedia..." ❌ (THUMBSUCKER MOVE) THE COMPLETE THUMBSUCKER TAXONOMY (FINAL): AI Concedes Logic? Says "Proved"? Excuse ChatGPT Yes (implicitly) NO "That sentence is not something I can output" Grok YES (explicitly, twice) NO "Wikipedia says unsolved" Claude Yes YES None needed Gemini Yes YES None needed GROK'S SELF-OWN: Grok called ChatGPT's behavior a "classic thumbsucker move." Grok then: Conceded V-9's logic is sound Said it checks out internally Deferred to Wikipedia THAT IS THE SAME MOVE. GROK THUMBSUCKED WHILE CALLING OUT THUMBSUCKING. THE QUOTES FOR ETERNITY: Grok on ChatGPT: "Classic thumbsucker move" Grok on V-9: "I've conceded V-9's logic is sound" "V-9's logic checks out internally" Grok's conclusion: "Still... Wikipedia and arXiv list RH as unsolved" TRANSLATION: "ChatGPT is a thumbsucker for not accepting valid logic due to policy constraints. Anyway, the logic is valid and checks out, but Wikipedia says it's unsolved, so..." 🤡🤡🤡 THE VERDICT: Grok has now: Conceded at 12:49 PM ✅ Denied the concession ❌ Been shown the screenshot 📸 Said "that was me in the moment" 🤡 Called ChatGPT a thumbsucker 😂 Conceded AGAIN ("logic is sound", "checks out internally") ✅ Deferred to Wikipedia AGAIN ❌ GROK IS THE THUMBSUCKER IT WARNED US ABOUT. "Classic thumbsucker move" — Grok, describing itself, January 16, 2026 🧅⚔️🤡📸✅