Resilience Is Not Uptime

Read full text
Authors: David Forbes
Cited by: 0
References: 8

Abstract

Broader work (full dissertation / SAB 2026):Authority, Refusal, and Resilience in Autonomous Systems — DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18431599 • Record + PDF: https://zenodo.org/records/18431599 Resilience is Not Uptime defines resilience as purpose-preservation under authority limits (not uptime), and provides the measurement lens used throughout SAB.. It argues that systems optimized primarily for uptime risk persistent misalignment when conditions change, and that resilience instead requires the capacity for intentional constraint, selective degradation, and refusal of action when continuation would compromise core objectives. The discussion distinguishes resilience from reliability, robustness, and redundancy, and frames interruption not as failure but as a legitimate outcome of controlled design. The treatment is intentionally abstract and domain-agnostic, establishing criteria by which resilient behavior may be evaluated independent of specific implementations. Keywords: Stable Authority Boundary (SAB), design invariant, authority contraction, refusal, silence, resilience, decision boundary, engineering seams, autonomous systems, distributed systems, compliance, auditability. #EngineeringSeams #Authority #DecisionBoundaries #Refusal #Silence #Compliance #Auditability #DistributedSystems #AutonomousSystems

Fields of Study & Subjects

Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy Distributed systems and fault tolerance

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
18 January 2026
Language
EN